: Electric vehicles (EVs) have been widely promoted as the future of clean transportation, with promises of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and minimizing environmental pollution. On the other hand, internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, which rely on gasoline or diesel, are often criticized for their emissions and contribution to climate change. However, when considering the full lifecycle of both types of vehicles from raw material extraction to disposal—there are certain circumstances in which ICE vehicles may appear to have a lower overall environmental impact than EVs. This comparison depends on several key factors, including battery production, energy sources, recycling efficiency, and alternative fuel options.

Battery Production for EVs Has a High Environmental Impact

One of the most significant environmental concerns related to EVs is the production of their lithium-ion batteries. These batteries require rare earth metals such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel, which must be extracted through mining. The mining process itself is highly energy-intensive and has severe environmental and social consequences:

• Deforestation and Habitat Destruction – Mining operations for lithium and cobalt, particularly in countries such as Chile, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and Australia, have led to deforestation and damage to ecosystems.
• Water Consumption – Lithium extraction, especially in South America’s lithium triangle (Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia), requires thousands of liters of water per kilogram of lithium extracted, depleting local water supplies and affecting agriculture.
• Toxic Waste and Pollution – The chemical processes used in battery production generate large amounts of toxic waste, which can contaminate soil and water supplies if not properly managed.

Additionally, the manufacturing of EV batteries requires a significant amount of energy, and if that energy comes from fossil-fuel-based power plants, the carbon footprint of battery production can be quite high. Some studies estimate that the carbon emissions from battery production alone can be equivalent to driving a gasoline-powered car for several years before the EV even hits the road.

Electricity Production and Energy Sources Matter

While EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, they still rely on electricity, which must be generated from some source. The environmental impact of EVs largely depends on how clean the electricity grid is in a given region.

• Fossil Fuel-Based Electricity – In countries where the majority of electricity comes from coal, oil, or natural gas, charging an EV indirectly contributes to carbon emissions. For instance, in China and India—two of the largest EV markets—electricity production is still heavily reliant on coal, making EVs less environmentally friendly than they might seem.
• Renewable Energy Sources – On the other hand, in places like Norway or Iceland, where most electricity comes from hydropower and geothermal energy, EVs truly achieve a low-carbon footprint.

Comparatively, modern ICE vehicles, particularly hybrid and high-efficiency diesel models, have significantly improved fuel efficiency and emissions standards, making them competitive in terms of overall environmental impact in regions where electricity production is still carbon-intensive.

Lifespan, Recycling, and Disposal Challenges

EV Battery Longevity and Recycling

• EV batteries degrade over time and typically need to be replaced after 8 to 15 years, depending on usage.
• The recycling process for lithium-ion batteries is still inefficient and expensive. Unlike traditional lead-acid car batteries, which have a recycling rate of over 95%, lithiumion batteries are much harder to recycle due to their complex chemical composition.
• Without proper recycling infrastructure, a significant amount of battery waste could become an environmental hazard in the future.

ICE Vehicle Recycling Advantages

• ICE vehicles, on the other hand, have a well-established recycling system. Most car parts, including engines, transmissions, and catalytic converters, can be reused or repurposed.
• Scrap metal from gasoline cars is easily recyclable, making disposal less problematic compared to large-scale EV battery waste.

Thus, while EVs eliminate emissions from fuel combustion, their long-term sustainability will depend on improvements in battery recycling and second-life applications.

Alternative Fuels: A Potentially Greener Solution?

While EVs are often seen as the best solution for reducing vehicle emissions, alternative fuels for ICE vehicles could provide a cleaner and more sustainable option without requiring a complete overhaul of the global transportation infrastructure.

Synthetic Fuels (e-Fuels)

• E-fuels are synthetic fuels created from captured carbon dioxide and renewable energy sources.
• They can be used in existing ICE vehicles, making them a promising alternative for reducing emissions without abandoning traditional gasoline engines.
• Some studies suggest that e-fuels could be as clean as EVs if produced using 100% renewable energy.

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles (FCEVs)

• Hydrogen-powered cars emit only water vapor, making them a truly clean alternative.
• However, the current production of hydrogen is still energy-intensive and often relies on fossil fuels, limiting its environmental benefits.
• If hydrogen production shifts to renewable sources (e.g., green hydrogen from electrolysis using solar or wind power), FCEVs could become a strong competitor to EVs.

Biofuels and Hybrid Technology

• Biofuels derived from plant materials (e.g., ethanol, biodiesel) can reduce the carbon footprint of ICE vehicles.
• Hybrid vehicles combine fuel efficiency with electric power, reducing emissions without requiring full electrification.

By investing in cleaner fuel alternatives, ICE vehicles could remain a viable and environmentally friendly option without the downsides of large-scale battery production and disposal issues.

Reference: https://data.thaiauto.or.th/auto/auto-news/dailynews/10319-ev?utm_source=chatgpt.com

                     https://www.thansettakij.com/climatecenter/sustainability/600815?utm_source=chatgpt.com